![]() ![]() The old law doesn’t satisfy our current concerns,” Reidenberg noted. It was enacted before the days of digital photography, so this kind of data mining wasn’t even on the horizon. I think we should impose, by statute, a warrant requirement.”ĭriver license information is protected by a federal statute, the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994, but law enforcement agencies are exempt from the restrictions in that law, he said. “ICE doesn’t need warrants to do that type of search. “That’s a significant civil liberties infringement for drivers across the country,” he told TechNewsWorld. Reidenberg, founding academic director of the Center on Law and Information Policy at the Fordham University School of Law in New York City. ICE’s bulk searches of DMV databases assume that everyone in the database is guilty in order to find a particular individual, explained law professor Joel R. “We’ve also seen them run pictures of celebrities through a database after being told a suspect looked like a certain celebrity,” Laperruque said. We’ve seen cases where they’ve run police sketches through a facial recognition database. “Law enforcement is always going to be looking for a way to push to the edge of any acceptable behavior. States and counties should be allowed to adopt stricter standards if they think they are necessary, Laperruque added. “Congress should set a floor for how and when this technology should be used, just as we have limits for wiretaps and other kinds of surveillance activities,” he said. “It’s the Wild West.”Ī quarter of all police departments have the capacity to use facial recognition technology, and the FBI runs an average of 4,000 searches a month, Laperruque noted. “Right now, it’s an incredibly invasive technology that’s being applied without limits,” he told TechNewsWorld. Rules need to be set on the general use of facial recognition, maintained Jake Laperruque, senior counsel for The Constitution Project at the on Government Oversight, a government watchdog group in Washington, D.C. The House Committee on Homeland Security plans to hold a hearing on Wednesday to learn how the Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection and the Secret Service use the technology. ![]() The House Committee on Oversight and Reform held hearings in May and June on the impact of facial recognition technology on civil rights and liberties. The technology has attracted congressional attention in recent months. “This practice should be stopped for the time being, and the use of facial recognition needs to be weighed by Congress and the public because it’s an extremely privacy-invasive technology that poses serious risks to civil liberties,” he told TechNewsWorld. Scott, senior counsel and director of the domestic surveillance project of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, an advocacy organization in Washington, D.C. “The use of DMV photos for facial recognition is essentially treating everyone as a suspect,” said Jeramie D. For example, in Utah, FBI and ICE agents performed more than 1,000 facial-recognition searches between 20. The records show that federal law enforcement has fostered a cozy relationship with state DMV officials, the Post found. Researchers at Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology used public records requests to gather a cache of documents that show the agencies have turned state DMV databases into the foundation of a vast surveillance infrastructure, The Washington Post reported Sunday. State motor vehicle departments have become a rich source of facial recognition data for and FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |